At Medina McKelvey you get the same experience for lower overall legal spend. We work efficiently and with lower overhead, passing the savings on to our clients. With us, you don’t pay for inefficient and inexperienced junior attorneys like BigLaw often uses.
At big firms, lawyers have to bill more hours, manage more cases, and keep more internal clients happy, which all means less time for their clients and their cases. By lowering the number of cases and hours and focusing on clients and efficiency, the lawyers at Medina McKelvey can provide more attention to their clients and cases and produce higher quality work product.
With fewer cases and billable hours, and a lean structure and approach, Medina McKelvey can put client service as the top priority. Be wary of the seasoned BigLaw partner who makes the pitch, only to hand off the matter to less experienced junior lawyers who bill more time for less value.
Rather than putting three or four (or even more!) junior attorneys on every case like BigLaw often does, Medina McKelvey offers clients a carefully selected menu of options to choose from as litigation progresses. If the matter requires lawyering up, we can quickly assemble an experienced team of attorneys that is better, more efficient, and costs less than an army of junior associates.
Why Not BigLaw?
As many industry experts have said for years, BigLaw is broken and resistant to real change. Rates continue to increase to feed the top of the pyramid while value and quality have decreased. Because of advances in technology, changes in the industry, and clients demanding more value, boutique law firms—like Medina McKelvey—are better positioned to provide expertise and quality service at a lower overall cost.
Still think BigLaw is the only way to go? Here’s how BigLaw compares to Medina McKelvey:
We wouldn’t be the lawyers we are today without having worked in BigLaw, but there are alternatives. With so much at stake in litigation, don’t you owe it yourself to see if we might be the right fit?