Yesterday, the California Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated decision in Adolph v. Uber Technologies, Inc., a case that will affect the landscape of arbitration for years to come. In this update, we briefly summarize the decision and what it means for you as an employer, and we invite you to our upcoming webinars on Tuesday, August 1 at 11:00 a.m. PDT and Tuesday, August 8 at 1:00 p.m. PDT to learn more about the decision and how to protect your business from wage and hour lawsuits in California.

On February 15, 2022, a five-year-old kindergarten student diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder was illegally and improperly restrained by an Oakdale Heights Elementary School special education teacher.

For the first time this year, California is requiring employers to report not only their employees’ pay data but also pay data for individuals hired through labor contractors (i.e., staffing agencies). On an annual basis, these reports will be due the second Wednesday in May for the prior year.

On February 15, 2023, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals delivered another chapter in the arbitration agreement saga playing out in California and across the U.S. in a case called Chamber of Commerce of the U.S. v. Bonta.

As you find your footing in the new year, we wanted to send a quick reminder that it’s a great time to circle back to those best practices we mentioned.  Taking care of compliance issues in the first part of the year means you’ll have more time to focus on running your business.

As 2022 comes to a close, there are three things every business—large and small—should consider doing as part of their 2023 New Year’s resolutions.

In the short time that the Viking River v. Moriana case has been out, a few trends are emerging in wage and hour lawsuits. The Viking River decision does not just impact California employers with active litigation, but also influences how employers should approach arbitration agreements going forward.

An important decision came down from the California Supreme Court this week. The decision clarifies how employers should report meal and rest period premium payments. Failing to properly adhere to this new reporting standard may leave your business vulnerable to liability.